Global cooperation declined sharply, as conflicts escalated in many parts of the world.
In 2024, the number of conflicts continued to
increase, marked by, among others, the ongoing
Russia–Ukraine conflict, the Israel–Hamas war
in Gaza, hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah,
intensified fighting in eastern Democratic Republic
of Congo and civil wars in Sudan and Myanmar.
Reported battle-related deaths stayed near 2023
levels, with the Russia–Ukraine conflict making
up over 40% of the total. The number of forcibly
displaced people likewise continued its growth,
reaching a record 123 million.60 The war in Sudan
alone displaced approximately 11.5 million people. Beyond the kinetic sphere of conflict, other
dimensions also worsened. Cyberattacks
intensified, with incidents surging across Asia, the Middle East and Europe – including highprofile attacks affecting large organizations across
both the public and private sectors. “Grey-zone”
activity and infrastructure disruptions across
digital and energy infrastructure also intensified,
especially in 2025. Europe experienced gas‑pipeline
sabotage and damage to sub-sea cables, while
three major multi-cable outages occurred in the
Red Sea and West Africa. The sharpest decline in this pillar was the
deterioration in global multilateral actions,
namely resolutions and peacekeeping missions,
which have not kept pace with the growth of
conflicts. The number of UN Security Council
(UNSC) resolutions fell from 50 in 2023 to
46 in 2024, and the ratio of multilateral peace
operations to conflicts declined by about 11%
YoY. This reflects heightened geopolitical tensions,
which have made conditions difficult for UN
intervention. Until the UNSC vote in November
2025 authorizing an international stabilization force
for the Gaza Strip, the UNSC had not mandated
a new peacekeeping operation since 2014. Furthermore, budget cuts have put pressure
on existing missions – personnel deployed to
multilateral peace operations fell by more than
40% between 2015 and 2024, and a budgetary
crunch disrupted a mission’s function in 2024. In this context, the role of the UN’s engagement
has evolved, leaning more on special political
missions and special envoys, concurrent with
a rise in regionally led frameworks. Given the pressures on peace and security,
it is perhaps not surprising that perceptions of
cooperation are pessimistic. About half of surveyed
council members expected cooperation to
deteriorate, and about half of surveyed executives
pointed to developments in peace and security
as affecting their ability to conduct business.
This was the highest of any pillar after trade
and capital (Figure 13).
These tensions are also manifesting in how
economies prepare for the future; many have
responded by increasing defence spending,
including China, India, the EU, Japan and Australia.
In parallel, all 32 NATO member states met the
defence spending target of 2% of GDP in 2025,
whereas more than 10 fell short the year before. With NATO raising its spending target to 5%
of GDP for 2035,70 national defence spending
is set to rise further.
Still, there are some sources of hope. Survey
respondents noted that major powers have so
far managed their rivalries with restraint, preventing
competition from evolving into escalation.
A panel
of geopolitical experts interviewed for this report
highlights the rise of “patchwork resilience”, where
cooperation is succeeding in regional initiatives
despite receding in global multilateral arrangements.
Indeed, successful cooperation in this pillar has
been achieved through smaller coalitions. Several
regional bodies have stepped up to stabilize
or manage crises (such as the African Unionled security transition in Somalia, and Southern
African Development Community deployments in
Mozambique and the eastern Democratic Republic
of Congo).
Beyond formal frameworks, minilateral
diplomacy also contributed to de‑escalation in
2025. Türkiye mediated talks between Ethiopia and
Somalia under the Ankara Declaration, leading to a
de-escalation of tensions. Armenia and Azerbaijan
agreed on the text of a peace treaty and steps to
keep third-country forces off their borders – with
EU/US facilitation. These examples underscore
how, even as large UN troop deployments recede,
tailored coalitions can still reduce risks and open
channels for political settlement.









Comments
Post a Comment